Aqua Design

Services › Design & Sourcing

Design & Sourcing: end-to-end services

Water and treatment projects stall or go wrong at the same points: going to vendors before you know what you’re working with, getting proposals back that you can’t compare, or finding after award that the original intent has quietly been renegotiated.

Design & Sourcing is owner-side support through those stages, from building the information base your project depends on, through to keeping delivery aligned with what was actually specified. Six connected stages, each producing something you can act on, each usable on its own or as part of a full assignment.

Baseline Requirements Technology fit Integration Sourcing Implementation
Engage & deliver

What this work gives you control over

A scope pack that suppliers can’t reinterpret. Performance criteria you can actually check. Clear boundaries between what each party is responsible for. And a design that can be extended without rebuilding from scratch.

Vendor-ready requirements: What a supplier must propose and provide.
Information & approval criteria: How performance is checked and approved.
Connections & handover readiness: Where boundaries are, and what is required at handover.
Upgrades & roadmap: How to modularise and plan staged improvements.

A quick way to use this section

Start where you are. Pick a focus area, scan what it clarifies, then use the Navigator to see what comes next.

1) Choose a focus area

Baseline → Requirements → Technology fit → Integration

2) Check the “why” and the basis

Constraints first: selection logic, KPIs, monitoring intent, approval checks, and information requests.

3) Move into delivery alignment

When you’re ready, carry the outputs into sourcing and implementation.

Why this exists

When decisions get made too early, you pay for it later

Vendors receive requests before the site data is solid. Technologies get shortlisted from brochures rather than tested against actual operating conditions. Connections between systems, physical, electrical, operational, get left to be sorted out during delivery. And commissioning gets treated as a final approval event rather than a performance check. By the time any of that appears as a problem, it’s expensive to fix. These stages exist to structure the decisions that matter before procurement begins, so what gets built is what was actually needed, and what gets handed over can be shown to work.

Streams we typically work with

STP - Municipal / domestic sewageETP - Industrial / trade effluentGWTP - Greywater treatmentVWRP - Vehicle wash waterLWRP - Laundry wash waterBiosolids & sludge to resource recovery

Clear boundaries to avoid conflicts

We work between owner intent and delivery partners, tightening the decision basis without becoming a vendor or the detailed designer. Early, we set a clear design basis (outcomes, constraints, connections and assumptions), workable pathways based on site conditions, and approval information for commissioning and sustained operation.

What we do

  • State clearly what the site produces, what the constraints are, and what suppliers are actually being asked to deliver
  • Turn targets into measurable criteria, so performance can be verified, not just claimed
  • Keep option evaluation fair, same rules, same check requirements, for every technology and supplier considered
  • Build the procurement package, scope, connections and evaluation logic that protects the design basis when it hits the market
  • Stay engaged through delivery, so what gets built reflects what was agreed, not what was convenient

What we don’t do

  • We don’t replace your detailed designer, EPC or equipment supplier, and we don’t sell equipment
  • We work on the owner’s side, making sure the decisions that guide procurement and delivery are deliberate
  • And the outcomes are provable

Design focus areas

These are the specialist stages clients typically enter through. Each is a detailed section and each connects forward into delivery alignment.

Focus area

Baseline & characterisation

Before targets, before technology, before any supplier conversation, you need to know what you’re actually working with. Flows, variability, site constraints, and what’s still uncertain. This stage makes that explicit.

Explore

Focus area

Requirements, reuse & savings

A performance target that can’t be measured isn’t a target, it’s a starting point for a dispute. This stage translates what you need to achieve into approval criteria, check requirements and a savings case that holds up to scrutiny.

Explore

Focus area

Technology & equipment fit

Supplier proposals look credible on paper. This stage tests them against your operating conditions, your site constraints and your operators, before anyone is committed to anything.

Explore

Focus area

Integration, automation & de-risking

A technology decision made in isolation will fail at the connections. This stage makes connection points, controls intent and commissioning check explicit, so what gets built works as a system, not just as individual units.

Explore

Delivery alignment

Focus area

Sourcing advisory

An RFP that leaves room for interpretation will get interpreted, differently by every bidder. This stage builds the procurement package that controls what suppliers respond to and keeps bids genuinely comparable.

Explore

Focus area

Implementation & applied support

Award is where most projects start to drift. This stage keeps the original design intent visible through delivery, in submittals, in change requests, and in a commissioning process based on information rather than assumptions alone.

Explore

Engagement routes

Ways to engage

Choose the pack that matches where you are. Each one ends with a defined output, documented, usable, and ready to move the project forward.

Pack 1

Rapid baseline & options clarity

You need to understand what you’re working with and which routes are workable, without committing to a design direction yet.

  • Baseline intelligence + data-gap plan
  • Scenario options + trade-off logic
  • Minimum verification / testing plan

Pack 2

Performance range & information requirements

The direction is agreed. Now you need targets, connections and approval criteria in a form suppliers can be held to.

  • Performance range + approval KPIs
  • Technology screening + whole-life cost view
  • Connection points + controls intent

Pack 3

Procurement control & approval approach

You’re going to market or already looking at bids. This pack structures the evaluation so the decision stays well-supported and the contract reflects what was actually specified.

  • Scope boundaries + controlled equivalence rules
  • Evaluation approach + clarification support
  • Verification plan

Start an enquiry

Share the outcome you need, the constraints you’re facing, and any timing drivers. If you don’t have all the data, that’s fine; we’ll define the minimum set to move forward.

What helps us respond quickly

  • Outcome target (compliance, reuse class, stability goal, cost/risk driver)
  • Current snapshot (flow, variability, constraints, pain points)
  • Where you are in the decision cycle (baseline → implementation)
  • Any existing drawings, data, or vendor proposals (if available)

Note: This form is a UI starter. Wire it to your Contact page or CRM route.

FAQ

Common questions

Short answers to the questions that usually come up before a specialist design engagement.

Do you do detailed design or EPC?

No, we don’t replace the appointed detailed designer/EPC/OEM. We define the decision basis, requirements, connections and approval information so delivery is clear and comparable.

Are you vendor-neutral?

We don’t sell equipment. Our role is to match needs to technologies through site-fit criteria and information requests, then support a fair, comparable sourcing process.

Can we engage you mid-procurement?

Yes. Many engagements start during vendor comparisons, tightening requirements, clarifications and scorecards so bids remain comparable and scope gaps are exposed early.

What do you need from us to start?

The outcome you need, what’s driving urgency, and any constraints you already know. If data is missing, we’ll define the minimum gap-closure testing plan as part of the baseline stage.